The Institute > Publications

Publications

In press

  • Beylat, M., Sassenberg, K., Yzerbyt, V. & Woltin, K. A. (in press). Followers’ regulatory mode and leadership style preferences: Does the task time perspective moderate their relation? Collabra.

  • Baylat, M., Woltin, K.-A., Barbedor, J., Sassenberg, K., & Yzerbyt, V. (in press). Followers' locomotion mode predicts preferring assertive leaders: Regulatory fit by means of valued social characteristics of others. European Journal of Social Psychology.

  • Bendixen, A., Wegner, T.G.G., & Einhäuser, W. (in press). Facilitating Ethics Application and Review for Interdisciplinary Human-Participant Research via Software-Based Guidance and Standardization. In B. Meyer, U. Thomas & O. Kanoun (Eds.), Hybrid Societies - Humans Interacting with Embodied Technologies (Vol. 1). Springer.

  • Bittermann, A., Petrule, C., Ritter, V., Haberkamp, A., Hofmann, S. G., & Rief, W. (in press). Research on Translational Psychological Treatment: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.

  • Pummerer, L., Gkinopoulos, T., Douglas, K. M., Jolley, D., & Sassenberg, K. (in press). The Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories (AMCT): Applying appraisal theories to understanding emotional and behavioral reactions to conspiracy theories. Psychological Inquiry.

  • Spitzer, L., Bosnjak, M., & Mueller, S. (in press). Testing the Usability of the Psychological Research Preregistration-Quantitative (PRP-QUANT) Template. Meta-Psychology.

 

Quicklinks to publication year 

Conference Papers

2024

  • Baylat, M., Woltin, K. A., Yzerbyt, V., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). With whom do people compare at work? The role of regulatory mode and social comparison motives.With whom do people compare at work? The role of regulatory mode and social comparison motives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 54(6), 319-331.   http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13032

  • Blask, K., Maehler, D. B., & Kerwer, M. (2024). Data on COVID-19-related Research Questions Spanning Diverse Disciplinary and National Contexts. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 12: 2, pp. 1–5.   https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.111

  • Chasiotis, A., Benz, G., Jonas, M., Kerwer, M., Nuwaltzew, P., Stoll, M., Barth, J., Breuer, C., Burgard, T., Crusius, J ., Dalbert, C., Fischer, L., Günther, A., Kleen, H., Lieb, K., Meerpohl, J. J., Rüschemeyer, G., Schäfer, S. K., Schneider, J., & Wahner, U. (2024). KLARpsy-Richtlinie zum Verfassen allgemeinverständlicher Zusammenfassungen psychologischer Metaanalysen im deutschsprachigen Raum. Psychologische Rundschau, 75(3), 234-248.   https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000681

  • DDP-Bildung & VerbundFDB (2024). Stamp – Standardisierter Datenmanagementplan. Version 1.0. Frankfurt am Main: DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation.   https://www.forschungsdaten-bildung.de/files/Stamp-1-0-handbuch.pdf

  • Ditrich, L., Reinhardt, J., Roth, G., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). Integrative emotion regulation relates to sympathy and support for outgroups – Independent of situational outgroup behaviour. PLoS ONE, 19, e0296520.   https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296520

  • Ditrich, L., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). #Stand with Ukraine: Analysing the links between Germans’ emotions and their readiness to protest in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.   https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13066

  • Ditrich, L., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). Threat and reactions to violated expectations in groups: Adding control to the equation. European Review of Social Psychology, 35, 1-44.   https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2023.2211463

  • Doré, A., Grammes, J., Egri, E., Priesterroth, L., Frenzel, S.B., Spörkel, O., & Kubiak, T. (2024). Identification with characters of a national narrative health communication campaign targeting type 2 diabetes. Health Communication, 1-8.   https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2378256

  • Gieselmann, M., Hagedorn, J., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). Do perceived benefits compensate for low provider trustworthiness in disclosure decisions? An experimental investigation. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications. Advance online publication.   https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000440

  • Glöckner, A., Gollwitzer, M., Hahn, L., Lange, J., Sassenberg, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2024). Quality, replicability, transparency in research in social psychology: Implementation of recommendations in Germany. Social Psychology, 55(3), 134–147.   https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000548

  • Hahn, L., Buttlar, B., Künne, R., & Walther, E. (2024). Introducing the trier univalence neutrality ambivalence (TUNA) database: A picture database differentiating complex attitudes. PLoS ONE, 19(5), e0302904.   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302904

  • Hampel, N., Ditrich, L., Scholl, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). Enactive mastery experience improves attitudes toward digital technology via self-efficacy – A pre-registered quasi-experiment. Behaviour and Information Technology, 43(2), 298–311.   https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2022.2162436

  • Hoch, E., Scheiter, K., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). Promotion focus, but not prevention focus of teachers and students matters when shifting towards technology-based instruction in schools. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 22030.   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73463-z

  • Jonas, M., Kerwer, M., Stoll, M., Benz, G. & Chasiotis, A. (2024). Equivalent User Experience and Improved Community Augmented Meta-Analyses Knowledge for a New Version of a Plain Language Summary Guideline. PLOS ONE.   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300675

  • Jonas, M., & Rosman, T. (2024). All research summaries are scientific, but some are more scientific than others?—Indications for a mediation of the relationship between author and text scientificness through perceived scientificness. Collabra: Psychology, 10 (1): 123196.   https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.123196

  • Kerwer, M., Jonas, M., Stoll, M., Benz, G., & Chasiotis, A. (2024). A randomized controlled study on the effectiveness of plain language summaries of psychological meta-analyses: Targeting knowledge, user experience, relevance and trust. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.   https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000570

  • Künstler-Sment, J., Eckert, S., Favella, G., Kerwer, M., & Jansen, M. (2024). Standardisierter Datenmanagementplan für die Bildungsforschung (Stamp) – Ein projektbegleitendes Tool für das Forschungsdatenmanagement. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 27:1117-1140.   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-024-01246-3

  • Pummerer, L., Fock, L., Winter, K., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). Conspiracy beliefs and majority influence. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1-16.   https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2397491

  • Sassenberg, K., & Winter, K. (2024). Intraindividual conflicts reduce the polarization of attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 33, 190-197.   https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214241242452

  • Spitzer, L., & Mueller, S. (2024). Stage 1 Registered Report: Restriction of researcher degrees of freedom through the Psychological Research Preregistration-Quantitative (PRP-QUANT) Template. Recommended by PCI Registered Reports.   https://rr.peercommunityin.org/articles/rec?id=480

  • Stoll, M., Bähr, M., Becker, E., Kerwer, M., Benz, G., Jonas, M., Chasiotis, A. (2024). User Feedback on Plain Language Summaries: A Qualitative Study in a German General Population Sample. Fachsprache - Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication, 46(1–2), 40-60.   https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v46i1-2.2244

  • Tschopp, M., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). The impact of human-AI relationship perception on voice shopping intentions. Human-Machine Communication, 8, 101-117.   https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.8.5

  • Winter, K., Hornsey, M.J., Pummerer, L., & Sassenberg, K. (2024). Public agreement with misinformation about wind farms. Nature Communications 15, 8888.   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53278-2

2023

  • Bayer, S., Blask, K., Gnambs, T., Jansen, M., Maehler, D. B., Meyermann, A., & Neuendorf, C. (2023). Data for Psychological Research in the Educational Field: Spotlights, Data Infrastructures, and Findings from Research. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 11(12).   https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.105

  • Behrens, K., & Blask, K. (2023). RDM Compas: Building Competencies for the Professional Curation of Research Data. Proceedings of the Conference on Research Data Infrastructure (Vol. 1).   https://doi.org/10.52825/cordi.v1i.365

  • Behrens, K., Quandt, M., Zenk-Möltgen, W., Beck, K., Brück, R. (2023). KonsortSWD Measure TA.2-M.12: FDMontheground - Projektbericht.   https://zenodo.org/records/10260847

  • Bittermann, A., McNamara, D., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2023). The Landscape of Research on Prior Knowledge and Learning: A Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9

  • Blask, K. (2023). Forschungsdatenmanagement. ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology).   https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12623

  • Bucher, L., Burgard, T., Tran, U., Prinz, G., Bosnjak, M., & Voracek, M. (2023). Keeping Meta-Analyses Alive and Well: A Tutorial on Implementing and Using Community-Augmented Meta-Analyses in PsychOpen CAMA. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(4).   https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231197611

  • Burgard, T. & Bittermann, A. (2023). Reducing Literature Screening Workload with Machine Learning. Systematic Review of Tools and their Performance. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 231(1), 3-15.   https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000509

  • Burgard, T., Wedderhoff, N., & Bosnjak, M. (2023). Hotspots in Psychology - 2023 Edition. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 231(1), 1-2.   https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000508

  • Chasiotis, A., Benz, G., Jonas, M., Kerwer, M., Nuwaltzew, P., Stoll, M., Barth, J., Breuer, C., Burgard, T., Crusius, J., Dalbert, C., Fischer, L., Günther, A., Kleen, H., Lieb, K., Meerpohl, J. J., Rüschemeyer, G., Schäfer, S. K., Schneider, J., & Wahner, U. (2023). Langfassung: KLARpsy-Richtlinie zum Verfassen allgemeinverständlicher Zusammenfassungen psychologischer Metaanalysen im deutschprachigen Raum. PsychArchives.   https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.13170

  • Chasiotis, A., Benz, G., Kerwer, M., Nuwaltzew, P., Stoll, M., & Jonas, M. (2023). KLARpsy-Richtlinie zum Verfassen allgemeinverständlicher Zusammenfassungen psychologischer Metaanalysen - 2. Überarbeitete Version. PsychArchives.  https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12492

  • Jonas, M., Kerwer, M., Chasiotis, A., & Rosman, T. (2023). Indicators of trustworthiness in lay-friendly research summaries: Scientificness surpasses easiness. Public Understanding of Science, 33(1), 37-57.   https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231176377

  • Leibniz-Institut für Psychologie (ZPID). (Hrsg.). (2023). Verzeichnis Testverfahren. Kurznamen. Langnamen. Autoren. Testrezensionen (29., aktualisierte Auflage). Trier: ZPID.   https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12306  [Gesamtverzeichnis]

  • Rosman, T. & Grösser, S. (2023). Belief updating when confronted with scientific evidence: Examining the role of trust in science. Public Understanding of Science, 33(3), 308-324.  https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231203538

  • Schmidt, K., Edelsbrunner, P. A., Rosman, T., Cramer, C., & Merk, S. (2023).  When perceived informativity is not enough. How teachers perceive and interpret statistical results of educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 130, 104134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104134

  • Seekircher, J., Burgard, T., & Bosnjak, M. (2023). The Effects of Clinical Meditation Programs on Stress and Well-Being. An Updated Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) With Active Comparison Groups. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 231(1), 16-29.   https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000510

  • Spitzer, L., & Mueller, S. (2023). Registered report: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research. PLoS ONE, 18(3), e0281086.   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281086

  • Stoll, M., Kunzler, A. M., & Chasiotis, A. (2023). User Experience of German Plain Language Summaries of Psychological Meta-Analyses ("KLARpsy-Texte") - A Qualitative Study Including Thinking Aloud. PsychArchives.  http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12913

 

2022

  • Benz, G., Kerwer, M., Chasiotis, A., Jonas, M., Stoll, M., & Nuwaltzew, P. (2022). Bericht zur 1. Evaluation der Richtlinie zum Verfassen von KLARtexten zu psychologischen Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen. PsychArchives.  https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.7045

  • Bittermann, A. (2022). Publikationstrends der Psychologie zu Themen gesellschaftlicher und fachlicher Relevanz: Juni 2022. ZPID Science Information Online, 22(2).  http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.7053

  • Bittermann, A. & Rieger, J. (2022). Finding Scientific Topics in Continuously Growing Text Corpora. In Arman Cohan et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing (pp. 7–18), Gyeongju, Republic of Korea. Association for Computational Linguistics.  https://aclanthology.org/2022.sdp-1.2/

  • Bittermann, A., Müller, S. M., & Rieger, J. (2022). PsychTopics: Wie man den Überblick über die Forschungslandschaft der Psychologie behält. Open Password, Doppelausgabe: # 1099 und #1100.  https://www.infobroker.de/password-online/archiv/a-farewell-to-a-writer-willi-bredemeier-kollege-partner-freund-von-elisabeth-simon/

  • Bohndick, C., Breetzke, J., & Rosman, T. (2022). Asking students about their fit with the university: A response surface analysis of demands-abilities fit. Active Learning in Higher Education, 146978742211243.  https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221124306

  • Bohndick, C., Breetzke, J., & Rosman, T. (2022). A comparison between different ways to assess demands-abilities fit in higher education: Empirical results and recommendations for research practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896710

  • Bosnjak, M., Fiebach, C., Mellor, D. T., Mueller, S., O'Connor, D. B., Oswald, F. L., & Sokol-Chang, R. (2022). A template for preregistration of quantitative research in psychology: Report of the Joint Psychological Societies Preregistration Task Force. American Psychologist, 77(4), 602-615.   https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000879

  • Burgard, T. (2022). Kollaborative Meta-Analysen mit PsychOpen CAMA. Open Password.  https://www.infobroker.de/password-online/archiv/gbi-genios-erwirbt-vermarktungrechte-an-wti-datenbanken/

  • Burgard, T., Bosnjak, M., & Studtrucker, R. (2022). PsychOpen CAMA: Publication of Community-Augmented Meta-Analyses in Psychology. Research Synthesis Methods, 13: 134-143.  http://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1536

  • Burgard, T., Steinmetz, H. (2022). Evidence in management science related to psychology: benefits, tools, and an example of a community-augmented meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 73:1135–1150  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00270-z

  • Chasiotis, A., Benz, G., Jonas, M., Kerwer, M., & Stoll, M. (2022). Psychologie für alle: Kurze, laiengerechte, allgemeinverständliche, richtlinienbasierte Zusammenfassungen ("KLARtexte) psychologischer Evidenz. In M. Krämer, S. Dutke, G. Bintz, & M. Lindhaus (Hrsg.), Psychologiedidaktik und Evaluation XIV (S. 319-327).  Düren: Shaker Verlag.

  • Chasiotis A., Kerwer M., Stoll M. (2022). Plain Language Summaries: Ziele, Herausforderungen und die Entwicklung evidenzbasierter Richtlinien. In: K. Rathmann, K. Dadaczynski, O. Okan, M. Messer M (Hrsg.) Gesundheitskompetenz. Springer Reference Pflege – Therapie – Gesundheit (S. 1-10). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62800-3_150-1

  • Daikeler, J., Silber, H., & Bosnjak, M. (2022). A meta-analysis of how country-level factors affect web survey response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 64(3), 306-333.   https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853211050916

  • Frank, M., Schramm, L. F., Volz, L., Brachem, J., & Kvetnaya, T. (2022). Open Science in der Lehre – ein Kulturwandel mit systemimmanenten Hürden. Psychologische Rundschau, 73(1), 18-52.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000578

  • Günther, A. (2022). Open Access aus der Perspektive der Psychologie. In H. Ertl & B. Rödel (Hrsg.), Offene Zusammenhänge. Open Access in der Berufsbildungsforschung (S. 167-176). Bonn: Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung.

  • Jonas, M., Bittermann, A., Chasiotis, A., & Rosman, T. (2022). To Have the Best Interest at Heart: Analyzing the Match Between Laypersons' Interests and Publication Activity in Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:899430.   https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899430

  • Parsons, S., Azevedo, F., Elsherif, M.M., ... Spitzer, L., ... et al. (2022). A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 312-318.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4

  • Rosman, T., Bosnjak, M., Silber, H., Koßmann, J., & Heycke, T. (2022). Open Science and Public Trust in Science: Results from Two Studies. Public Understanding of Science, 31(8), 1046-1062.  https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221100686

  • Rosman, T., Burgard, T., & Bosnjak, M. (2022). Die Open Science-Infrastruktur in der deutschsprachigen Psychologie: Ergebnisse der ZPID-Nutzerstudie 2021. ZPID Science Information Online 22(1).  https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.6514

  • Rosman, T. & Kerwer, M. (2022). Mechanisms of epistemic change: The roles of reflection and social interaction. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 21(3), 193-209.  https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221098860

  • Schmidt, K., Rosman, T., Cramer, C., Besa, K.-S., & Merk, S. (2022). Teachers trust educational science - Especially if it confirms their beliefs. Frontiers in Education, 7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.976556

  • Schneider, J., Rosman, T., Kelava, A., & Merk, S. (2022). Do open-science badges increase trust in scientists among undergraduates, scientists, and the public? Psychological Science, 33(9), 1588–1604.  https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221097499

  • Spitzer, L., Mueller, S. (2022). Using a test battery to compare three remote, video-based eye-trackers. In 2022 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 1–7.   https://doi.org/10.1145/3517031.3529644

  • Stoll, M., Breuer, C., Benz, G., Jonas, M., Kerwer, M., & Chasiotis, A. (2022). Users’ Perspectives on German Plain Language Summaries of Psychological Meta-Analyses (“KLARtexte”) - A Focus Group Study. PsychArchives.   https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5415

  • Stoll, M., Kerwer, M., Lieb, K., Chasiotis, A. (2022). Plain Language Summaries: A Systematic Review of Theory, Guidelines, and Empirical Research. PLOS ONE, 17(6): e0268789.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268789

  • Wedderhoff, O., Chasiotis, A., & Rosman, T. (2022). When freedom of choice leads to bias: How threat fosters selective exposure to health information. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 937699.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937699

 

2021

  • Batzdorfer, V., Steinmetz, H., Biella, M., & Alizadeh, M. (2021). Conspiracy theories on Twitter: emerging motifs and temporal dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics,13:315–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-021-00298-6

  • Benz, G., Jonas, M., Kerwer, M., Stoll, M. & Chasiotis, A. (2021). PLan Psy - Interessenkatalog: Eine empirisch fundierte Klassifikation psychologiebezogener Interessen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung: Entscheidungshilfe zur Selektion KLARtext-relevanter Meta-Analysen in PSYNDEX. PsychArchives.  http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.5034

  • Betsch, C., Korn, L., Burgard, T., Gaissmaier, W., Felgendreff, L., Eitze, S., Sprengholz, P., Böhm, R., Stollorz, V., Ramharter, M., Promies, N., De Bock, F., Schmid, P., Renner, B., Wieler, L.H., Bosnjak, M. (2021). The four weeks before lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a weekly serial cross-sectional survey on risk perceptions, knowledge, public trust and behaviour, 3 to 25 March 2020. Euro Surveillance, 26(42):pii=2001900.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.42.2001900

  • Bittermann, A. (2021). Publikationstrends der Psychologie zu Themen gesellschaftlicher und fachlicher Relevanz: Januar 2021. ZPID Science Information Online, 21(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4542

  • Bittermann, A., Batzdorfer, V., Müller, S. M., & Steinmetz, H. (2021). Mining Twitter to detect hotspots in psychology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 229(1), 3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000437

  • Blask, K., Gerhards, L., & Jalynskij, M. (2021). PsyCuraDat: Designing a User-Oriented Curation Standard for Behavioral Psychological Research Data. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579397

  • Bosnjak, M., Wedderhoff, N., & Steinmetz, H. (2021). Hotspots in Psychology – 2021 Edition. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 229(1), 1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000438

  • Burgard, T. (2021). Cumulative Meta-Analysis. Robustness of Evidence in Survey Methodology. Dissertation. Universität Trier, Fachbereich IV – Soziologie.  https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-e656-fae9

  • Burgard, T., Bosnjak, M., & Studtrucker, R. (2021). Community-augmented meta-analyses (CAMAs) in Psychology: Potentials and current systems. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 229(1), 15-23.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000431

  • Chasiotis, A., Wedderhoff, O., Rosman, T., & Mayer, A.-K. (2021). The role of approach and avoidance motivation and emotion regulation in coping via health information seeking. Current Psychology, 40(10), 5235–5244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00488-3

  • Colmsee, I., Hank, P, & Bosnjak, M. (2021). Low self-esteem as a risk factor for eating disorders: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 229(1), 48–69.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000433

  • Jakob, E.A., Steinmetz, H., Wehner, M.C., Engelhardt, C., & Kabst, R. (2021). Like It or not: When corporate social responsibility does not attract potential applicants. Journal of Business Ethics, 178:105–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04960-8

  • Jonas, M., & Stoll, M. (2021). Opening Up Science: KLAR-Texte als Tor zur Wissenschaft. Open Password.  https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzM2OCwiNWJiNzFlNGE3YTg1IiwwLDAsMzM0LDFd

  • Kerwer, M., Chasiotis, A., Stricker, J., Günther, A. & Rosman, T. (2021). Straight from the scientist's mouth - Plain language summaries promote laypeople’s comprehension and knowledge acquisition when reading about individual research findings in psychology. Collabra: Psychology; 7(1), 18898.  https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18898

  • Kerwer, M., Stoll, M., Jonas, M., Benz, G., & Chasiotis, A. (2021). How to put it plainly? Findings from two randomized controlled studies on writing plain language summaries for psychological meta-analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:771399.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771399

  • Krampen, G. (2021). Fake news, Verschwörungstheorien und Fake olds in der Gesellschaft und Politik: Erträge psychologischer Analysen. Report Psychologie, 46(4), 16-24. 

  • Krampen, G. (2021). Fakes und fragwürdige Praktiken in der psychologischen Wissenschafts- und Anwendungspraxis: Fake news, fake olds, subjektive Theorien auch bei uns? Report Psychologie, 46(3), 16-23. 

  • Krampen, G. (2021). Positionierungen der Psychologie zu Gesellschaften im Wandel im Kontext des Millenniums: Gut gemeint, (psychologie-)historisch überzogen. Politische Psychologie/Journal of Political Psychology, 9(1), 58-75.

  • Richter, J., Bittermann, A., Christiansen, H., Krämer, L. V., Kuhberg-Lasson, V., & Schneider, S. (2021). Der Forschungsbeitrag der deutschsprachigen Klinischen Psychologie zu Themen der psychischen Störungen und Psychotherapie. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 49(2), 113–127.  https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000582

  • Rosman, T., Adler, K., Barbian, L., Blume, V., Burczeck, B., Cordes, V., . . . Zidarova, I. (2021). Protect ya Grandma! The Effects of Students' Epistemic Beliefs and Prosocial Values on COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683987

  • Rosman, T., Kerwer, M., Chasiotis, A., & Wedderhoff, O. (2021). Person- and situation-specific factors in discounting science via scientific impotence excuses. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 17(4), 288–305.  https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.3735

  • Rosman, T., Kerwer, M., Steinmetz, H., Chasiotis, A., Wedderhoff, O., Betsch, C., & Bosnjak, M. (2021, advance online). Will COVID-19-related economic worries superimpose virus-related worries, reducing nonpharmaceutical intervention acceptance in Germany? A prospective pre-registered study. International Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 607–622.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12753

  • Rosman, T., & Merk, S. (2021). Teacher’s reasons for trust and distrust in scientific evidence: Reflecting a "smart but evil" stereotype? AERA Open,7, 233285842110285.   https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211028599

  • Silber, H., Tvinnereim, E., Stark, T.H., Blom, A.G., Krosnick, J.A., Bosnjak, M., Clement, S.L., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A.-S., John, M., Jónsdóttir, G.A., Lawson, K., Liao, P.-S., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., & Shamshiri-Petersen, D. (2021). Lack of replication or lack of generalization? Differences in cultural values across countries to explain the appearance and disappearance of a classic question wording effect across cultures. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab007

  • Spitzer, L., Mueller, S. (2021). Registered Report Protocol: Survey on attitudes and experiences regarding preregistration in psychological research. PLoS ONE, 16(7), e0253950.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253950

  • Steinmetz, H., Isidor, R., & Bauer, C. (2021). Gender Differences in the Intention to Start a Business: An Updated and Extended Meta-Analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 229(1), 70–84.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000435

  • Struminskaya, B. & Bosnjak, M. (2021). Panel conditioning: Types, causes and empirical evidence of what we know so far. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Advances in Longitudinal Survey Methodology.  Hoboken, NY: Wiley.   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119376965.ch12

  • Wedderhoff, N., Gnambs, T., Wedderhoff, O., Burgard, T. & Bosnjak, M. (2021). On the structure of affect: A meta-analytic investigation of the 24 dimensionality and the cross-national applicability of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Zeitschrift für Psychologie 229(1), 24–37.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000434

  • Weißkopf, M., Wilkoszewski, H., van den Bogaert, V., Chasiotis, A., Fähnrich, B., Frank, A., ... Wichmann, C. (2021). Qualität in der Wissenschaftskommunikation. In BMBF-Referat Wissenschaftskommunikation; Wissenschaftsjahre (Eds.), FactoryWisskomm: Handlungsperspektiven für die Wissenschaftskommunikation (pp. 43-50). Berlin, Germany: BMBF.

  • Yu, G.B., Sirgy, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2021). The Effects of Holiday Leisure Travel on Subjective Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Experience Sharing. Journal of Travel Research, 60(8), 1677–1691.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520966381

  • Yu, G.B., Sirgy, M., Bosnjak, M., & Lee, D.-J. (2021). A pre-registered study of the effect of shopping satisfaction during leisure travel on satisfaction with life overall: The mitigating role of financial concerns. Journal of Travel Research, 60(3), 639-655.  https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0047287520933688
    Pre-registration: http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2351

  • Zimmermann, S., Clef, L., Azúa, C., Bosnjak, M., Jäckel, M., Kopp, J., Lutz, W., Neuenkirch, E., Rosman, T., Scherhag, J., Schreiber, M., & Spitzer, L. (2021). Studieren in der Pandemie: Eine Befragung zur Situation der Studierenden während der COVID-19-Pandemie an der Universität Trier. PsychArchives.  https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5258

2020

  • Batzdorfer, V., Steinmetz, H. (2020). Reviewing Radicalization Research Using a Network Approach. Journal for Deradicalization, 23, 45-95. Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/issue/view/29/showToc

  • Batzdorfer, V., Steinmetz, H., & Bosnjak, M. (2020). Big Data in der Radikalisierungsforschung: Eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit. Psychologische Rundschau, 71, 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000480

  • Betsch, C., Wieler, L. Habersaat, K., Korn, L., Felgendreff, L., Eitze, S., Schmid, P., Sprengholz, P., Schmich, P. Stollorz, V., Ramharter, M., Bosnjak, M., Omer, S.B., Scherzer, M., & Salvi, C. (2020). Monitoring behavioural insights related to COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10232), 1255-1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30729-7

  • Bittermann, A. (2020). Die Identifikation psychologischer Forschungsthemen mit Topic Modeling. Dissertation. Universität Trier, Fachbereich I – Psychologie.  https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-d9d9-032d

  • Bittermann, A., Greiner, N. & Fischer, A. (2020). Unterscheiden sich die Forschungsinteressen von Frauen und Männern in der Psychologie? Eine Analyse von PSYNDEX-Einträgen über einen Zeitraum von 50 Jahren. Psychologische Rundschau, 71(2), 103-110.
    https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000482

  • Blask, K., Gerhards, L., & Jalynskij, M. (2020). BMBF-project PsyCuraDat: Online Survey (Metadata in Psychology 2.0: What researchers really need). Data repository PsychArchives.
    PsyCuraDat: Online survey data file version 1.0.0, http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2751

  • Blask, K., Gerhards, L., & Jalynskij, M. (2020). Metadata in Psychology 2.0: What researchers really need – Study description of the data referring to the online survey conducted in the BMBF-funded project PsyCuraDat.
    ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information). https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.2757

  • Blask, K., Jalynskij, M., & Gerhards, L. (2020). Metadata in Psychology 1.0: What researchers really need – Study description of the data referring to the expert interviews conducted in the BMBF-funded project PsyCuraDat.
    ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information). https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.2750

  • Blask, K., Jalynskij, M., & Gerhards, L. (2020). BMBF-project PsyCuraDat: Expert interviews (Metadata in Psychology 1.0: What researchers really need). Data repository PsychArchives.
    PsyCuraDat: Expert interviews, interview transcripts and data file version 1.0.0, http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2756

  • Bosnjak, M. (2020). Aktuelle Forschungsthemen am Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID). Psychologische Rundschau, 71(2), 85–88.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000481

  • Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352-356.

  • Bosnjak, M., Cheung, M. W. L., & Viechtbauer, W. (Series Eds.). SpringerBriefs in Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis [Edited book series]. Available from https://www.springer.com/series/10240

  • Bosnjak, M., & Wedderhoff, N. (2020). Hotspots in Psychology - 2020 Edition. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 228(1), 1-2.  https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000398

  • Burgard, T., Bosnjak, M. & Wedderhoff, N. (2020). Response rates in online surveys with affective disorder participants. A meta-analysis of study design and time effects between 2008 and 2019. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 228(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000394

  • Burgard, T., Wedderhoff, N., & Bosnjak, M. (2020). Konditionierungseffekte in Panel-Untersuchungen: Systematische Übersichtsarbeit und Meta-Analyse am Beispiel sensitiver Fragen. Psychologische Rundschau, 71, 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000479.

  • Chasiotis, A. (2020). I Want to Know Everything: Motivational and Self-Regulatory Determinants of the Intention to Comprehensively Search for Health Information. [Doctoral dissertation, Trier University]. OPUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-dee2-5a3f

  • Daikeler, J. & Bosnjak, M. (2020). How to conduct effective interviewer training: A meta-analysis (pp. 47-62). In K. Olson, J. Smyth, J. Dykema, A. Holbrook, F. Kreuter and B. West (Eds.), Interviewer Effects from a Total Survey Error Perspective. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.

  • Eilbacher, G., Bölter, R., Brändle, M., & Warner, P. (2020). Plugin for connecting external long-term archiving systems (Rosetta, Archivematica, Dataverse, DSpace/Sword, …). In A. Bigga, M. Brändle, R. Bölter, C. Decker, M. España, G. Eilbacher, M. Flasko, F. Krabbes, A. H. Leugers-Scherzberg, M. Mühlhölzer, D. Müller, P. Münch, T. Niers, D. Nüst, A. Pachzelt, M. Plich, R. Steffen, K. Thoden, H. Varachkina, P. Warner, N. Weiher, D. Wolf, & D. Withanage, OJS Software Workshop Report (pp. 7-10). Heidelberg, Germany: University Library Heidelberg.
    https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00028242

  • Gawronski, B., Brannon, S. M., Blask, K., & Walther, E. (2020). Exploring the contextual renewal of conditioned attitudes after counterconditioning. Social Cognition, 38, 287-323.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2020.38.4.287

  • Gerhards, L., Kellendonk, S., Lemaire, M., Blask, K., & Förster, A. (2020). Praxisleitfaden zur Integration externer Dienstleistungen in die FDM-Servicelandschaft von Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen.
    Universität Trier. https://doi.org/10.25353/UBTR-XXXX-53DA-34DF

  • Gerhards, L., Lemaire, M., & Kellendonk, S. (2020). Forschung + Datenmanagement = Forschungsdatenmanagement. Wann geht die Gleichung auf? Bericht zur Abschlusstagung des PODMAN-Projektes.
    Universität Trier. https://doi.org/10.25353/UBTR-XXXX-4728-6420

  • Kellendonk, S., Lemaire, M., & Gerhards, L. (2020). Workshop zur Implementierung von FDM-Services nach dem DIAMANT-Modell. Ein Workshopkonzept zur Anwendung des FDM-Referenzmodells DIAMANT an Forschungseinrichtungen.
    Universität Trier. https://doi.org/10.25353/UBTR-XXXX-563D-6E00

  • Kerwer, M., & Rosman, T. (2020). Epistemic Change and Diverging Information: How do prior epistemic beliefs affect the efficacy of short-term interventions? Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101886.

  • Kerwer, M., Rosman, T. (2020). Vom Großen ins Kleine - Übertragbarkeit eines Modells der epistemischen Lebensspannenentwicklung auf den epistemischen Wandel in Kurzzeitinterventionen. Psychologische Rundschau, 71(2), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000485

  • Kerwer, M., Rosman, T., Wedderhoff, O., & Chasiotis, A. (2020). Disentangling the process of epistemic change: The role of epistemic volition. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12372

  • Krampen, G. (2020). Autogenes Training gestern, heute, morgen: Relevanz, Status, Perspektiven. Entspannungsverfahren, 37, 47-70. 

  • Lemaire, M., Gerhards, L., Kellendonk, S., Blask, K., & Förster, A. (2020). Das DIAMANT-Modell 2.0. Modellierung des FDM-Referenzprozesses und Empfehlungen für die Implementierung einer institutionellen FDM-Servicelandschaft.
    Universität Trier. https://doi.org/10.25353/UBTR-XXXX-F5D2-FFFB

  • Lemaire, M., Kellendonk, S., & Gerhards, L. (2020).
    PODMAN: Prozessorientierte Entwicklung von Managementinstrumenten für Forschungsdaten im Lebenszyklus. Abschlussbericht. TIB-Portal. https://doi.org/10.2314/KXP:1729204805

  • Petras, V., Lüschow, A., Ramthun, R., Stiller, J., España-Bonet, C., & Henning, S. (2020). Query or document translation for academic search – What’s the real difference? In A. Arampatzis, E. Kanoulas, T. Tsikrika, S. Vrochidis, H. Joho, C. Lioma, C. Eickhoff, A. Névéol, L. Cappellato, & N. Ferro (Eds.), Experimental IR meets multilinguality, multimodality, and interaction: 11th International Conference of the CLEF Association, CLEF 2020, Thessaloniki, Greece, September 22–25, 2020, Proceedings (pp. 28-42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58219-7_3

  • Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Leichner, N., & Krampen, G. (2020).  Putting big fish into a bigger pond: Self-concept changes in psychology undergraduates. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44 (1), 14-28. 
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1493095.

  • Rosman, T., Schlag, M., & Merk. S. (2020). Das Zusammenspiel epistemischer Überzeugungen und der Bedeutsamkeitseinschätzung pädagogisch-psychologischen Wissens im Lehramtsstudium: Längsschnittliche und querschnittliche Analysen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 67(3), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2020.art15d

  • Rosman, T., Seifried, E., & Merk, S. (2020).  Combining Intra- and Interindividual Approaches in Epistemic Beliefs Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00570

  • Sirgy, M.J., Kim, M.Y., Joshanloo, M., Lee, D.-J., & Bosnjak, M. (2020). The relationship between domain satisfaction and domain importance: The moderating role of depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 2007–2030.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00168-w

  • Steinmetz, H., Batzdorfer, V., & Bosnjak, M. (2020). The ZPID lockdown measures dataset. ZPID Science Information Online, 20(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3019

  • Steinmetz, H., Isidor, R., & Bosnjak, M. (2020). Meta-analytische Strukturgleichungsmodelle: Potenziale und Grenzen illustriert an einem Beispiel aus der Organisationspsychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 71(2), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000483

  • Stricker, J., Chasiotis, A., Kerwer, M., & Günther, A. (2020).  Scientific abstracts and plain language summaries in psychology: A comparison based on readability indices. PLoS ONE.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231160

  • Wedderhoff, N., & Bosnjak, M. (2020). Erfassung der Primärstudienqualität in Meta-Analysen: Eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit. Psychologische Rundschau, 71(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000484

  • Wedderhoff, O., Chasiotis, A., & Rosman, T. (2020).  Erkenne dich selbst! Die Bedeutung adäquater vs. inadäquater Selbsteinschätzung relevanter Fähigkeiten bei der Präferenz von Gesundheitsinformationen. Psychologische Rundschau, , 71(2), 134-142.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000486

  • Weiß, B., Das, M., Kapteyn, A., Bosnjak, M. and Schaurer, I. (2020). Open probability‐based panels. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (Eds. N. Balakrishnan, T. Colton, B. Everitt, W. Piegorsch, F. Ruggeri and J.L. Teugels).  http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07988

2019

  • Bittermann, A. (2019).  Development of a user-friendly app for exploring and analyzing research topics in psychology. In G. Catalano, C. Daraio, M. Gregori, H. F. Moed & G. Ruocco (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (2634–2635). Rom: Edizioni Efesto. 
    http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2521

  • Bittermann, A. & Klos, E. M. (2019).  Ist die psychologische Forschung durchlässig für aktuelle gesellschaftliche Themen? Eine szientometrische Analyse am Beispiel Flucht und Migration mithilfe von Topic Modeling. Psychologische Rundschau, 70 (4), 239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000426.

  • Blask, K., & Förster, A. (2019). Designing an information architecture for data management technologies: Introducing the DIAMANT model. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 1–9.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000619841419

  • Bosnjak, M. & Gnambs, T. (2019). Hotspots in Psychology – 2019 Edition. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(1), 1-3.
    https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000350

  • Chasiotis, A., Wedderhoff, O., Rosman, T., & Mayer, A.-K. (2019).  The Role of Approach and Avoidance Motivation and Emotion Regulation in Coping via Health Information Seeking. Current Psychology, 1–10. 
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00488-3.

  • Chasiotis, A., Wedderhoff, O., Rosman, T., & Mayer, A.-K. (2019). Why do we want health information? The Goals Associated With Health Information Seeking Questionnaire (GAINS). Psychology & Health.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1644336

  • Daikeler, J., Bosnjak, M., & Lozar-Manfreda, K. (2019). Web versus other survey modes: An updated and extended meta-analysis comparing response rates. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 1-27.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz008

  • Emmer, C., Bosnjak, M., & Mata, J. (2019).  The association between weight stigma and mental health: A meta-analysis.
    Obesity Reviews, 1-13.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/obr.12935.

  • España-Bonet, C., Stiller, J., Ramthun, R., van Genabith, J., & Petras, V. (2019).
    Query translation for cross-lingual search in the academic search engine PubPsych. In E. Garoufallou, F. Sartori, R. Siatri, & M. Zervas (Eds.): Metadata and Semantic Research: 12th International Conference, MTSR 2018, Limassol, Cyprus, October 23-26, 2018, revised selected papers (pp. 37–49).
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2

  • Förster, A., Blask, K., & Lemaire, M. (2019). Wege zur Optimierung des Forschungsdatenmanagements - Die Forschungsperspektive des PODMAN-Projektes [Streamlining research data management - The research perspective of the PODMAN project]. BIBLIOTHEK - Forschung und Praxis, 43(1), 61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2019-2003

  • Grube, M.M., Scheidt-Nave, C., Gaertner, B., Lüdtke, D., Bosnjak, M., Heinrich , S., Lahmann, N., Meyer, G., Rapp, K., Riedel-Heller, S., Schäufele, M., Wolf-Ostermann, K., Zank, S., & Fuchs, J. (2019).  Public Health Monitoring 65+ in Deutschland - Auswahl und Definition von Indikatoren. Journal of Health Monitoring, 4 (2), 93-105.
    https://dx.doi.org/10.25646/5984  

  • Heycke, T., & Spitzer, L., 2019. Screen Recordings as a Tool to Document Computer Assisted Data Collection Procedures. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), pp.269–280. DOI:  http://doi.org/10.5334/pb.490

  • Jakob, E. A., Isidor, R., Steinmetz, H., Wehner, M. C., & Kabst, R. (2019). The other side of the same coin–how communal beliefs about entrepreneurship influence attitudes toward entrepreneurship. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 431-445.

  • Kalenborn, A., & Weiland, P. (2019). Beyond Badges and Leaderboards – Playable User Stories zur Verbesserung des Requirements Engineering. In: Oliver Linssen et al. (Hrsg.): Projektmanagement und Vorgehensmodelle 2019, Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI). Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn.

  • Knezevic, G., Lazarevic, L., Puric, D., Bosnjak, M., Teovanovic, P., Petrovic, B., & Opacic, G. (2019). Does Eysenck’s personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 155-164.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009
    Supplements:  http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2352

  • Krampen, G. (2019). Psychologie der Kreativität: Divergentes Denken und Handeln in Forschung und Praxis. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  • Krampen, G. (2019). Das Transferproblem bei der Vermittlung autoinstruktiver Entspannungsverfahren in Therapie und Prävention. Report Psychologie, 44(3), 12-20.

  • Krampen, G. (2019). Differentielle Indikation von Entspannungsmethoden in klinischen und präventiven Kontexten. Entspannungsverfahren, 36, 53-79.

  • Krampen, G. & Hasselhorn, M. (2019). Monitoring des Beitrags der Psychologie zur interdisziplinären Bildungsforschung. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften, 41(1), 13-36.
    https://10.24452/sjer.41.1.4

  • Kuhberg-Lasson, V. (2019). Wie gehen junge Erwachsene mit Gesundheitsinformationen um, und welche Faktoren beeinflussen die Informationsprozesse? (Dissertation. Universität Trier, Fachbereich I – Psychologie.) https://doi.org/10.25353/ubtr-xxxx-c795-4486

  • Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019).  Smart but evil? Student-teachers’ perception of educational researchers’ epistemic trustworthiness. AERA Open, 5 (3), 1-18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419868158.

  • Metzger, A., Mueller, S., Fiehler, K., & Drewing, K. (2019). Top-down modulation of shape and roughness discrimination in active touch by covert attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(2), 462-475.

  • Mueller, S. (2019). Inferring target locations from gaze data: A smartphone study. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (p. 41). ACM.

  • Mueller, S., de Haas, B., Metzger, A., Drewing, K., & Fiehler, K. (2019). Neural correlates of top‐down modulation of haptic shape versus roughness perception. Human brain mapping, 40(18), 5172-5184.

  • Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Merk, S., & Kerwer, M. (2019). On the benefits of ‘doing science’: Does integrative writing about scientific controversies foster epistemic beliefs? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 85-101.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.007

  • Rosman, T., Mueller, S., & Karadere, G. (2019).  Usability-Studie zur Weiterentwicklung des ZPID-Testarchivs: Vergleich von drei neuen Webseite-Mockups mit den aktuellen Webseiten. ZPID Science Information Online, 19(1). 
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2588

  • Silber, H., Schröder, J.,  Struminskaya, B., Stocké, V., Bosnjak, M. (2019). Does panel conditioning affect data quality in ego-centered social network questions? Social Networks, 56, 45-54.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2018.08.003

  • Sirgy, M.J., Kim, M.Y., Joshanloo, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2019).
    Is subjective ill-being related to Islamophobia in Germany? In search for moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies,1-21. 
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0063-3

  • Sirgy, M.J., Kim, M.Y., Joshanloo, M., Lee, D.-J., & Bosnjak, M. (2019).  The relationship between domain satisfaction and domain salience: The moderating role of depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00168-w.

  • Sirgy, M.J., Yu, G.B., Lee, D.-J., Joshanloo, M., Bosnjak, M., Jiao, J., Ekici, A., Gurel Atay, E., & Grzeskowiak, S. (2019).  The dual model of materialism: Success versus happiness materialism on present and future life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1-20.
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09763-8

  • Stricker, J. & Günther, A. (2019). Scientific misconduct in psychology: A systematic review of prevalence estimates and new empirical data. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(1), 53-63.
    https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000356

  • Walther, E., Blask, K., Halbeisen, G., & Frings, C. (2019). An action control perspective of evaluative conditioning. European Review of Social Psychology, 30:1, 271-310.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2019.1699743

  • Weber, B. (2019). „PAYWALL – The Business of Scholarship“. Filmvorführung mit anschließender kontroverser Podiumsdiskussion über das Open-Access-Publizieren. b.i.t. online, 22(2), 178-180. https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2019-02-reportage-weber.pdf

  • Weber, H. I., Vogt, S., Eberz-Weber, L., Steinmetz, H., Wagner, S. A., Walther, F., Weber, P., & Kabst, R. (2019). Participatory Budgeting: Findings From Germany. In Management Association, I. (Ed.), Civic Engagement and Politics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1087-1107). IGI Global.
    http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7669-3.ch054

  • Yu, G,B., Lee, D.-J., Sirgy, M.J, & Bosnjak, M. (2019).  Household income, satisfaction with standard of living, and subjective well-being: The moderating role of happiness materialism. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1-12. 
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00202-x.

2018

  • Bittermann, A. & Fischer, A. (2018). How to identify hot topics in psychology using topic modeling. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226, 3–13.
    https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000318.

  • Bohndick, C., Rosman, T., Kohlmeyer, S., & Buhl, H. (2018). The interplay between subjective abilities and subjective demands and its relationship with academic success. An application of the person-environment fit theory. Higher Education, 75(5), 839-854.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0173-6

  • Bosnjak, M. (2018). Evidence-based survey operations: Choosing and mixing modes (pp. 319-330). In D.L. Vannette & J.A. Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_42

  • Bosnjak, M. & Erdfelder, E. (2018). Hotspots in Psychology – 2018 Edition. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226(1), 1-2.
    https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000323

  • Bosnjak, M., Bauer, R., & Weyandt, K. (2018).  Mixed-devices in online surveys: Prevalence, determinants, and consequences (pp. 53-65). In A. Theobald (Ed.), Mobile Research. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18903-7_5

  • Bosnjak, M., Dannwolf, T., Enderle, T., Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B., Tanner, A., & Weyandt, K.W. (2018). Establishing an open probability-based mixed-mode panel of the general population in Germany: The GESIS Panel.  Social Science Computer Review, 36(1), 103-115.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317697949

  • Čehovin, G., Bosnjak, M., & Lozar-Manfreda, K. (2018). Meta-analyses in survey methodology: A systematic review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(4), 641-660.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy042

  • Cornesse, C., & Bosnjak, M. (2018). Is there an association between survey characteristics and representativeness? A meta-analysis. Survey Research Methods, 12,(1), 1-13.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2018.v12i1.7205

  • Das, M., Kapteyn, A., & Bosnjak, M. (2018). Open probability-based panel infrastructures (pp. 199-209). In D.L. Vannette & J.A. Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_25

  • Ekici, A., Sirgy, M.J., Lee, D.-J., Yu, G., & Bosnjak, M. (2018). The effects of shopping well-being and shopping ill-being on consumer life satisfaction. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(2), 333-353.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9524-9

  • Flaig, M., Simonsmeier, B. A., Mayer, A.-K., Rosman, T., Gorges, J., & Schneider, M. (2018). Conceptual change and knowledge integration as learning processes in higher education: A latent transition analysis.  Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 49-61.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.008

  • Kaiser, A., Kuhlmann, B.G., & Bosnjak, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of inhibitory-control deficits in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's dementia. Neuropsychology, 32(5), 615-633.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000460

  • Kerwer, M., & Rosman, T. (2018). Mechanisms of Epistemic Change – Under which circumstances does diverging information support epistemic development? Frontiers in Psychology 9:2278.
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02278.

  • König, C., Bajwa, N., Schui, G., & Fell, C. (2018). How Industrial-Organizational Psychology Can Benefit From Scientometrics (and Vice Versa). Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 403-407.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.90.

  • Krampen, G. (2018).  Das Transferproblem bei psychologischen Interventionen.  Report Psychologie, 43(7-8), 298-305.

  • Krampen, G. (2018).  Autogenes Training und Progressive Relaxation plus Psychoedukation bei Schlafstörungen und -problemen.  Entspannungsverfahren, 35, 21-32.

  • Kuhberg, V. (2018).
    Determinants of health information literacy in vocational school students: The role of personal beliefs. In A.-K. Mayer (Ed.), Health literacy across the life span (pp. 147-162). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

  • Kuhberg-Lasson, V., & Mayer, A.-K. (2018). Demographic characteristics and personality variables as predictors of health information literacy in young adults. In S. Kurbanoğlu, J. Boustany, S. Špiranec,  E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi & L. Roy (Eds.), Information literacy in the workplace. Fifth European Conference, ECIL 2017, Saint-Malo, France, September 18-21, 2017, revised selected papers (pp. 440-449). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 

  • Maercker, A., & Krampen, G. (2018). Entspannungsverfahren. In J. Margraf & S. Schneider (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie (Bd. 1: Grundlagen, Diagnostik, Verfahren, Rahmenbedingungen; 4., vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Aufl., S. 395-401). Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Mayer, A.-K. (2018). Examining the factorial structure and validity of the Everyday Health Information Literacy Screening Tool. Cogent Medicine: Public Health and Primary Care, (5)1, 1545378. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1545378

  • Mayer, A.-K. (Ed.). (2018). Health literacy across the life span. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.

  • Mayer, A.-K. (2018).
    Health literacy across the life span: A promising field of interdisciplinary research. In A.-K. Mayer (Ed.), Health literacy across the life span (pp. 7-19). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.

  • Mayer, A.-K. (2018). Subjective and objective measures of health information literacy: Do they provide complementary or redundant information? In S. Kurbanoğlu, J. Boustany, S. Špiranec,  E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi & L. Roy (Eds.), Information literacy in the workplace. Fifth European Conference, ECIL 2017, Saint-Malo, France, September 18-21, 2017, revised selected papers (pp. 481-490). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_50

  • Mayer, A.-K. & Friebe, J. (2018).  GInKA - Gesundheitsbezogene Informationskompetenzen im Alter. Projektbericht. ZPID Science Information Online, 18(1). 
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.870

  • Mayer, A.-K., Holzhäuser, J., Chasiotis, A., & Wedderhoff, O. (2018).
    Assessing health literacy by performance tests: The Health Information Literacy Knowledge Test (HILK). In A.-K. Mayer (Ed.), Health literacy across the life span (pp. 127-145). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.

  • Merk, S., Rosman, T., Muis, K. R., Kelava, A., & Bohl, T. (2018). Topic specific epistemic beliefs: Extending the Theory of Integrated Domains in Personal Epistemology. Learning and Instruction, 56, 84–97.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.008

  • Metzger, A., Mueller, S., Fiehler, K., & Drewing, K. (2019). Top-down modulation of shape and roughness discrimination in active touch by covert attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(2), 462-475  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24764.

  • Rosman, T. & Mayer, A.-K. (2018). Epistemic beliefs as predictors of epistemic emotions: Extending a theoretical model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 410-427.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12191

  • Rosman, T., Peter, J., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2018). Conceptions of scientific knowledge influence learning of academic skills: Epistemic beliefs and the efficacy of information literacy instruction. Studies in Higher Education, 43(1), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1156666

  • Schui, G. (2018). ZPID-Monitor 2016 zur Internationalität der Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich. ZPID Science Information Online, 18(2).
    https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2090.

  • Silber, H., Daikeler, J., Weidner, L., & Bosnjak, M. (2018). Web Survey. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07984

  • Stark, T., Silber, H., Krosnick, J.A., Blom, A.G., Aoyagi, M., Belchior, A., Bosnjak, M., Lund Clement, S., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A.-S., John, M., Jónsdóttir, G.A., Lawson, K., Lynn, P., Martinsson, J., Shamshiri-Petersen, D., Tvinnereim, E., & Yu, R.-R. (2018). Generalization of classic question order effects across cultures. Sociological Methods & Research, 1-36.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304

  • Walter, E., Halbeisen, G., & Blask, (2018). What You Feel Is What You See: A Binding Perspective on Evaluative Conditioning. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(3):e27551.
    https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.27551.

  • Wedderhoff, O., Chasiotis, A., Rosman, T. , & Mayer, A.-K. (2018). Unveiling the subjective perception of health information sources: A three-dimensional source taxonomy based on similarity judgements. Frontiers in Communication 3:57.
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00057.

2017

  • Blask, K., Walther, E., & Frings, C. (2017).  Ignorance reflects preference: the influence of selective ignoring on evaluative conditioning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29, 939–948.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2017.1340893

  • Chasiotis, A., Wedderhoff, O., & Mayer, A.-K. (2017). Construction and psychometric analysis of a questionnaire measuring goals associated with health information seeking. In A. Schorr (Hrsg.), Health Psychology 2017 - Kurzfassungen (S. 30 - 32). Kongress für Gesundheitspsychologie, Siegen, Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

  • Kerwer, M., Bölter, R., Dehnhard, I., Günther, A., & Weichselgartner, E. (2017). Projekt DataWiz: Entwicklung eines Assistenzsystems zum Management psychologischer Forschungsdaten. In J. Kratzke, & V. Heuveline (Hrsg.), E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten managen. Heidelberg: heiBOOKS. 
    https://doi.org/10.11588/heibooks.285.377

  • Krampen, G. (2017).
    Autogén Tréning a depresszió kezelésében (Autogenous training in the treatment of depressions). In Németh, M. & Stiblá (Eds.), Testtől Lélekig (From Body to Soul): Életelvűség és jövőre irányultság a relaxációs és szimbólumterápiákban (Bionomical concept and future-orientation in relaxation and symboltherapy) (pp.141-150). Budapest: Central Press ’99 Kaposvár.

  • Krampen, G. (2017). Elsa Köhler (1879 - 1940). In U. Wolfradt, E. Billmann-Mahecha & A. Stock (Hrsg.), Deutschsprachige Psychologinnen und Psychologen 1933-1945 (2., aktualisierte Auflage, S. 243-244). Berlin: Springer.

  • Krampen, G. (2017). Heinrich Düker (1898 - 1986). In U. Wolfradt, E. Billmann-Mahecha & A. Stock (Hrsg.), Deutschsprachige Psychologinnen und Psychologen 1933-1945 (2., aktualisierte Auflage, S. 89-90). Berlin: Springer.

  • Krampen, G. (2017). On the scientific discourse practice in psychology: Professional comments and replies in different subdisciplines of psychology up to 2015. The Open Psychology Journal, 10, 19-26. 
    https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101710010019

  • Krampen, G. (2017). Randomized controlled trials on relaxation training in complementary treatment of mental disorders. Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research, 4, 9-26.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.924

  • Krampen, G. (2017). Richard Herbertz (1878 - 1959). In U. Wolfradt, E. Billmann-Mahecha & A. Stock (Hrsg.), Deutschsprachige Psychologinnen und Psychologen 1933-1945 (2., aktualisierte Auflage, S. 174-175). Berlin: Springer.

  • Krampen, G., & Eberwein, M. (2017). Diagnostik von Kreativität bei Vorschul- und Schulkindern. In U. Trautwein & M. Hasselhorn (Hrsg.), Begabungen und Talente (= Tests und Trends – Jahrbuch der pädagogisch-psychologischen Diagnostik, Bd. 15, S. 103-124). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  • Leichner, N. (2017). Implementierung des Informationskompetenz-Trainings »BLInK« an der Universität Luxemburg – Ein Erfahrungsbericht. ZPID Science Information Online, 17(1).

  • Mayer, A.-K. (2017). Messung von Informationskompetenzen. Perspektiven für Forschung und Praxis. In A. Schüller-Zwierlein (Hrsg.),Informationskompetenz, Informationsverhalten, Informationsverarbeitung (S. 49-71). Regensburg: Universitätsbibliothek Regensburg. 
    https://doi.org/10.5283/epub.36337

  • Mayer, A.-K., Leichner, N., & Steeg, M. (2017). ZPID-Nutzerbefragung 2016. ZPID Science Information Online, 17(2).

  • Merk, S., Rosman, T., Rueß, J., Syring, M., & Schneider, J. (2017). Pre-service teachers' perceived value of general pedagogical knowledge for practice: Relations with epistemic beliefs and source beliefs. PLoS ONE, 12(9) , 1-25.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184971

  • Peter, J., Leichner, N., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2017). Making information literacy instruction more efficient by providing individual feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 42(6) , 1110-1125. 
    Published online: 17 Sep 2015. 
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1079607

  • Rammstedt, B., Danner, D., & Bosnjak, M. (2017).  Acquiescence response styles: A multilevel model explaining individual-level and country-level differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 107(1), 190-194.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.038

  • Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Kerwer, M., & Krampen, G. (2017). The differential development of epistemic beliefs in psychology and computer science students: A four-wave longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 49, 166-177. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.006.

  • Wahner, U. (2017). Emotionsregulation: Skalen und Fragebögen (2000-2017). PSYNDEX-Datenbankauszug. Trier: ZPID

  • Wedderhoff, O., Chasiotis, A., & Mayer, A.-K. (2017). Flight of Icarus- How Overestimating one's health information literacy might lead to dysfunctional information behavior. In A. Schorr (Hrsg.), Health Psychology 2017 - Kurzfassungen (S. 30 - 32). Kongress für Gesundheitspsychologie, Siegen, Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers..

  • Weichselgartner, E. (2017). DataWiz: Integration von Open-Science-Praktiken in den Forschungszyklus [Eingeladener Artikel]. Information – Wissenschaft & Praxis, 68(2-3), 159-162. 
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2017-0023

  • Weichselgartner, E., Baier, C., & Ramthun, R. (2017). PubPsych: A powerful research tool providing access to a broad supranational body of psychological knowledge. Datenbank-Spektrum., 17(1), 35-39. 
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-016-0244-3

2016

2015

2014

  • Arbeitsgruppe Qualitätsstandards des Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (2014). Qualitätsstandards zur Entwicklung, Anwendung und Bewertung von Messinstrumenten in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Umfrageforschung. Working Paper No. 230, RatSWD Working Paper Series..

  • Birke, P., Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., & Walter, B. (2014). A domain-specific test of procedural knowledge about information searching for students of Computer Science. In S. Kurbanoglou, S. Spiranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, & R. Catts (Eds.), Information literacy. Lifelong learning and digital citizenship in the 21st century – Second European Conference, ECIL 2014, Dubrovnik, Croatia, October 20-23, 2014. Proceedings (S. 683-692). Cham: Springer.

  • Forcher, B., Roth-Berghofer, T., Agne, S., & Dengel, A. (2014). Intuitive Justifications of Medical Semantic Search Results. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 30, 1-17. 
    doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2014.01.013

  • Forcher, B., Giloj, A., & Weichselgartner, E. (2014). Keyword-based semantic search engine Koios++. In M. Horridge, M. Rospocher, & J. van Ossenbruggen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ISWC 2014 Posters & Demonstrations Track, 1272, 241-244.

  • Gerards, A., Gerards, M., Kuhberg-Lasson, V., Singleton, K., & Trierweiler, L. (2014). Dokumentationsmanual PSYNDEX (aktualisierte Ausgabe). Trier: ZPID. Online im Internet.

  • Halbeisen, G., Blask, K., Weil, R., & Walther, E. (2014).   The role of recollection in evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 162 – 168.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.005

  • Krampen, G. (2014). Kommentar: Konzept für eine Onlinelabor-Infrastruktur der Psychologie - Inhaltlich und fachpolitisch nützlich und sinnvoll. Psychologische Rundschau, 65(2), 89-91.

  • Krampen, G. (2014). Szientometrie. In H.-W. Bierhoff, & F. Petermann, Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie (S. 53-58). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  • Krampen, G., Schui, G., Ferring, D., & Bauer, H. (2014).Charakteristika der meist zitierten englischsprachigen Zeitschriftenbeiträge der Publikationsjahre 1981 bis 2010 aus der Psychologie in den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Psychologische Rundschau, 65(3), 159-168.

  • Krampen, G., Schui, G., Ferring, D., & Bauer, H.P.W. (2014). Zitationshäufigkeiten englischsprachiger Zeitschriftenbeiträge der Publikationsjahre 1981 bis 2010 aus der Psychologie in den deutschsprachigen Ländern: Materialien (Originaldaten, Variablenbeschreibungen und die TOP 107 Fremdzitierten).ZPID Science Information Online, 14(1).

  • Kuhberg-Lasson, V., Singleton, K., & Sondergeld, U. (2014). Publikationscharakteristika im interdisziplinären Feld der Bildungsforschung. Journal für Bildungsforschung Online, 6(3), 134-155.

  • Kuhberg-Lasson, V., Singleton, K., & Sondergeld, U. (2014).Merkmale des Publikationsverhaltens in der Bildungsforschung. In: M. Krämer, U. Weger & M. Zupanic (Hrsg.), Psychologiedidaktik und Evaluation X (S. 87-94). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (Hrsg.). (2014). Bibliographie psychologischer Literatur aus den deutschsprachigen Ländern (Band 43: 2013).Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.

  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation (ZPID). (Hrsg.). (2014). Verzeichnis Testverfahren. Kurznamen. Langnamen. Autoren. Testrezensionen (21., aktualisierte Auflage). Trier: ZPID. Online im Internet.

  • Leichner, N., Peter, J., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2014). Assessing information literacy using information search tasks. Journal of Information Literacy, 8(1), 3-20. 
    doi:10.11645/8.1.1870

  • Leichner, N., Peter, J., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2014). Fostering information literacy in German psychology students using a blended learning approach. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (S. 353-359). 
    doi:10.5220/0004795103530359

  • Leichner, N., Peter, J., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2014).Google Scholar versus Fachdatenbanken: Wie erfolgreich nutzen Studierende verschiedene Suchwerkzeuge?. In M. Ockenfeld (Hrsg.),Informationsqualität und Wissensgenerierung: Proceedings of the 3. DGI-Konferenz (S. 37-46). Frankfurt: DGI.

  • Mayer, A.-K. (2014). Informationskompetenz im Hochschulkontext – Interdisziplinäre Forschungsperspektiven. Tagungsbericht. Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 65(4-5), 297-298. 
    doi:10.1515/iwp-2014-0042

  • Peter, J., & Leichner, N. (2014). Informationskompetenz aus Sicht von Studierenden: Auswertung der Teilnehmerrückmeldungen eines Blended Learning-Trainings. Zeitschrift für Bibliothek, Information und Technologie, 17(6), 531-535.

  • Peter, J., Leichner, N., Mayer, A.-K., & Krampen, G. (2014). Das Inventar zur Evaluation von Blended Learning (IEBL): Konstruktion und Erprobung in einem Training professioneller Informationskompetenz. In M. Krämer, U. Weger, M., & Zupanic (Hrsg.), Psychologiedidaktik und Evaluation X (S. 275-282). Aachen: Shaker.

  • Rammstedt, B., Beierlein, C., Brähler, E., Eid, M., Hartig, J., Kersting, M., Liebig, S., Lukas, J., Mayer, A.-K., Menold, N., Schupp, J, & Weichselgartner, E. (2014). Qualitätsstandards zur Entwicklung, Anwendung und Bewertung von Messinstrumenten in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Umfrageforschung. Schmollers Jahrbuch – Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, 134(4), 1-31.

  • Schui, G., Hoffmann, J. M., & Krampen, G. (2014). ZPID-Monitor 2011 zur Internationalität der Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich: Der Kurzbericht. Psychologische Rundschau, 65(1), 24-29.

  • Singleton, K., Kuhberg-Lasson, V., & Sondergeld, U. (2014). Wer finanziert Forschungsprojekte zur Bildung? Inhaltliche und methodische Interessen der Drittmittelgeber. In: M. Krämer, U. Weger, & M. Zupanic (Hrsg.), Psychologiedidaktik und Evaluation X (S. 235-242). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

  • Weichselgartner, E. (2014). Optimierung der Webseiten von Forschungsdaten- und Datenservicezentren für den Zugriff durch Suchmaschinen. (RatSWD Working Paper Series, 234).